Reviews and Ratings

Martindale Awards

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale Ratings

Average Peer Rating

4.7/5.0

Average Client Rating

67% client recommended

Reviews (31)

Our reviews are compiled from our profiles on the legal directory Lawyers.com.

Source Rating Reviews by date
5.0 / 5.0
2023-07-11 07:53:21

No description provided

— Peer 07/11/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-27 04:04:32

Steven is an excellent lawyer with outstanding legal skills. He certainly has earned your highest rating.

— Peer 06/27/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-14 07:21:46

No description provided

— Peer 06/14/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-14 03:26:23

No description provided

— Peer 06/14/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-13 17:52:30

No description provided

— Peer 06/13/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-13 16:32:48

Client-centric savvy litigator who can handle a variety of disputes in a cost conscious and efficient way.

— Peer 06/13/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-13 15:40:32

No description provided

— Peer 06/13/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-13 14:52:56

No description provided

— Peer 06/13/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-13 14:46:05

I have had several cases over the years with Steve Jelenchick. Steve is a seasoned litigator who takes a creative and practical approach to his cases. He is always well prepared and is very effective.

— Peer 06/13/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-13 14:32:16

No description provided

— Peer 06/13/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-13 14:31:47

I found Steve very knowledgeable and fair.

— Peer 06/13/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2023-06-13 14:31:42

Steve is a great lawyer and great person. I highly recommend him.

— Peer 06/13/2023

5.0 / 5.0
2014-10-28 06:28:55

No description provided

— Peer 10/28/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-10-20 02:23:51

No description provided

— Peer 10/20/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-10-20 02:20:46

No description provided

— Peer 10/20/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2012-06-04 16:43:30

No description provided

— Peer 06/04/2012

5.0 / 5.0
2011-09-20 13:37:36

No description provided

— Peer 09/20/2011

5.0 / 5.0
2010-10-28

they did a great job.

— Client 10/28/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-04-08 11:26:23

No description provided

— Peer 04/08/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-04-05 10:34:37

No description provided

— Peer 04/05/2010

4.8 / 5.0
2023-06-13 15:08:14

Excellent Trial lawyer!

— Peer 06/13/2023

4.6 / 5.0
2023-06-14 03:52:52

No description provided

— Peer 06/14/2023

4.5 / 5.0
2010-10-24

Matt was great to work with and the individual that was suing us never responded back once Matt contacted them with our rebuttal.

— Client 10/24/2010

4.2 / 5.0
2012-06-07 17:59:11

No description provided

— Peer 06/07/2012

4.2 / 5.0
2012-06-07 17:57:54

Excellent attorney.

— Peer 06/07/2012

4.2 / 5.0
2010-03-29 16:54:24

No description provided

— Peer 03/29/2010

4.0 / 5.0
2014-10-20 09:51:57

No description provided

— Peer 10/20/2014

4.0 / 5.0
2014-06-02 15:59:21

No description provided

— Peer 06/02/2014

3.0 / 5.0
2012-06-04 12:51:54

No description provided

— Peer 06/04/2012

3.0 / 5.0
2009-11-20 14:31:11

No description provided

— Peer 11/20/2009

1.0 / 5.0
2023-07-28

Horrible! We’ve spent the last month trying to get someone to respond to our case. $5000 down the drain. Our experience with attorneys is they are vampires who suck the life out of people. Art came across as caring and wanted to help. We are the little guy. Taken advantage of in every way. We used the Wisconsin board to find an attorney. Awful! He needs reported! Evil!

— Client 07/28/2023